The system of record for security and compliance

Inventory, controls, evidence, vendors, and audits in one place. Built so proving your posture is a byproduct of running it.

NewAutomated evidence checks

Compliance work is mostly evidence work. Cyberwiz keeps evidence current, tied to the control it proves, and ready the moment someone asks for it.

  • Purpose-built

    Shaped around how security teams actually work: controls, evidence, vendors, and the auditors who ask.

  • Powered by AI

    Documents are read, matched to the control they prove, and scored: conclusions, not files.

  • Always current

    Evidence expires, integrations refresh, and controls re-check themselves, not once a year.

What Cyberwiz does

Everything you run, found for you

Cloud accounts, repositories, instances, devices and buckets, found by your integrations or added by hand. Define your own kinds. Every control and vendor question hangs off it.

Learn more

All assets

Everything this organization owns and has to harden, whether an integration found it or somebody entered it. Systems, processes and data repositories keep their own tabs.

Add asset
Search assets...KindClassificationStatusMore filtersColumns
NameKindOwnerClassificationStatusSourceLast updated
Snowflake ProductionCloud AccountOM. OrtizCriticalActiveManualAug 30
bindsec/cyberwizCode RepositorySR. ShahCriticalActiveGitHubAug 30
cyberwiz-prod-exportsStorage BucketOM. OrtizHighActiveAWSAug 30
cw-siem-sec-01Compute InstanceLA. LevyCriticalActiveAWSAug 30
AWS StagingCloud AccountLA. LevyCriticalActiveAWSAug 30
CW-IPH-017DeviceCD. CohenMediumActiveEA+1Aug 30
cyberwiz-alb-access-logsStorage BucketOM. OrtizMediumDiscoveredAWSAug 30
Azure ProductionCloud AccountNK. NovakCriticalActiveManualAug 29
cw-worker-prod-01Compute InstanceLA. LevyMediumDiscoveredAWSAug 29
github-actionsCode RepositorySR. ShahCriticalDiscoveredGitHubAug 29
CW-DEL-006DeviceCD. CohenLowActiveEntra IDAug 28
legacy-portalCode RepositoryFJ. FischerLowArchivedManualAug 27

Adopt a framework, not a spreadsheet

ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST 800-53, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, and NIS2 ship mapped to one shared control set. Satisfy a control once and every framework that asks for it moves.

Learn more
Adopted frameworks
4
11 supported
Controls in scope
287
Across 4 frameworks
Implemented controls
214
Across 4 frameworks
Avg. readiness
75%
Weighted by controls, across 4 frameworks
Search frameworks…TargetTypeRegionMandatoryAdopt a framework

Your frameworks (4)

ISO 27001v2022

Standard92 controlsGlobal

The information security management standard. Certifiable, and the one buyers ask for by name.

Adopted for
Whole organization
86%
Payments Platform· Product34 items · set 12 Mar 2026
71%
Adopt again

SOC 2 Type 2v2017 TSC

Framework63 controlsGlobal

Trust services criteria, reported on over a window rather than a moment.

Adopted for
Whole organization
71%
Adopt again

Evidence that checks itself

Connect a system or upload a document. Cyberwiz reads it, matches it to the control it proves, scores the result, and flags it when it goes stale.

Learn more

Active

21

Pending

1

In grace

2

Archived

0

LibraryInbox1
Search by name…TypeSourceStatusFreshnessFrameworkOwnerColumnsAdd evidence
NameSourceEvidence typeFrameworksCategoriesOwnerStatusFreshnessUploadedRenews
InfoSec_Policy_v3.2.pdfDocumentInformation Security PoliciesISO 27001+2Organizational controls+2MIMichael ParkadzeActiveValidFeb 14, 2026Feb 14, 2027
Entra ID: MFA coverageIntegrationAccess Control PolicyISO 27001+1Technological controls+1RORohit ShahActiveValidAug 1, 2026Nov 1, 2026
access-review-q3.xlsxDocumentManagement Oversight and ReportingSOC 2+1Organizational controls+1MAMaya OrtizActiveIn graceApr 6, 2026Jul 31, 2026
IR_Plan_2026.pdfDocumentIncident Response PlanISO 27001+2Organizational controls+2ADAdi LevyActiveValidMar 2, 2026Mar 2, 2027
threat-intel-briefing-jul-2026.pdfDocumentThreat IntelligenceISO 27001Technological controlsKAKarin NovakActiveValidJul 9, 2026Oct 9, 2026
cyber-program-charter-v2.docxDocumentCybersecurity Program CharterISO 27001+3Organizational controls+3MIMichael ParkadzeActiveValidJan 22, 2026Jan 22, 2027
JumpCloud: MDM enrollmentIntegrationAccess Control PolicyISO 27001+1Technological controls+1DADana CohenActiveValidAug 3, 2026Nov 3, 2026
awareness-training-completion-2026.xlsxDocumentManagement Oversight and ReportingISO 27001+1People controlsDADana CohenActiveIn graceMay 18, 2026Aug 18, 2026
vendor-risk-register-h1-2026.xlsxDocumentManagement Oversight and ReportingSOC 2+2Organizational controls+1MAMaya OrtizActiveValidJun 24, 2026Dec 24, 2026

Policies that count for something

Write the policy in the product, route it for approval, and publish it. Publishing emits evidence against the controls it answers for, so readiness moves without an upload.

Learn more
Asset Management PolicyDraftOrganization-wideAnnualNo review dateEveryoneSubmit for approval
FileView
Savedv1

Purpose

You cannot protect what you cannot see. Access reviews, vulnerability management, change control and incident response all begin by asking which systems exist and who is responsible for them, and every one of them is only as complete as the answer.

This policy sets out how the organization identifies its information assets, records them, assigns ownership of them, and manages them from acquisition through to disposal.

Scope

Applies to all employees, contractors and third parties who acquire, operate, hold or dispose of an asset on behalf of the organization. It covers end-user devices, servers, containers, databases, and the accounts, domains and cryptographic keys that make them reachable.

Roles and responsibilities

The policy owner owns the asset register as a whole and is accountable for its completeness. Asset owners are accountable for the individual assets recorded against their name.

The asset register

Every asset is recorded in a single register, whether a connector discovered it or a person entered it by hand. A record carries the asset’s name, its kind, its owner, its classification and its lifecycle state, and no record is complete without all five.

Classification

Every asset is classified when it is recorded and reclassified when what it holds changes. The classification decides what protection it gets, so an unclassified asset is treated as the most sensitive one it could be until somebody says otherwise.

Disposal

An asset leaves the register only once whatever it held has been destroyed or returned, and the record of its disposal outlives the asset itself.

Run vendor due diligence end to end

Send a questionnaire, chase the answers, score the findings, and track remediation. Vendors answer in their own portal, in their own language.

Learn more

Welcome, Bindsec 👋

Here are your security assessment results for “Basic Vendor Security Assessment”, requested by Vertex Labs.

1. Organizational profile

1.1 Nature and purpose of the engagement

1.1.1 What services does your organization provide to the client?

Choose the option that best matches.

Consulting servicesIT servicesManufacturingLogisticsEducation and trainingFinancial servicesMarketingOther

1.2 IT services

1.2.1 Which specific IT services does your organization provide?

Depends on Q1.1

Select every service that applies.

Hosting and infrastructureManaged databasesApplication developmentSupport and maintenance

Contents

  • 1. Organizational profile
  • 2. Data centre profile
  • 3. Secure development (SSDLC)
  • 4. Governance and compliance
  • 5. Access control
  • 6. Human resources
  • 7. Communications
  • 8. Network security
  • 9. Endpoint security

Give auditors a scoped view, not your account

Invite an auditor to specific frameworks and dates. They review controls and evidence in place, and leave with a Statement of Applicability.

Learn more
Search controls...FrameworkStatusReadiness
ControlFrameworkCategoryOwnerWeightReadinessStatus
A.5.1Policies for information securityISO 27001:2022Organizational controlsMIMichael ParkadzeCritical43%Failing
A.5.9Inventory of information and other associated assetsISO 27001:2022Organizational controlsMAMaya OrtizImportant100%Passing
A.5.15Access controlISO 27001:2022Organizational controlsMIMichael ParkadzeCritical86%Passing
A.5.17Authentication informationISO 27001:2022Organizational controlsRORohit ShahCritical62%Partial
A.6.3Information security awareness, education and trainingISO 27001:2022People controlsDADana CohenStandard0%Needs evidence
A.8.5Secure authenticationISO 27001:2022Technological controlsRORohit ShahCritical91%Passing
A.8.8Management of technical vulnerabilitiesISO 27001:2022Technological controlsADAdi LevyImportant58%Partial
A.8.13Information backupISO 27001:2022Technological controlsADAdi LevyImportant100%Passing
A.8.15LoggingISO 27001:2022Technological controlsKAKarin NovakStandard0%Needs evidence
A.8.24Use of cryptographyISO 27001:2022Technological controlsMAMaya OrtizImportant74%Partial

Answer the security questionnaire before it is sent

Publish your frameworks, monitored controls, policies and subprocessors to a trust center on your own domain. Keep the SOC 2 behind an access request and an NDA, and see who asked for what.

Learn more

BindSec Trust Center

Security and compliance, generated from our live programme and republished whenever it changes. Every figure below is the one our own auditors were shown.

Verified 11 September 2026bindsec.iotrust@bindsec.io
Security questionnaireRequest access
OverviewSecurity controlsSubprocessors
Compliance4 frameworks
SOC 2 Type 2Certified
ISO 27001Certified
GDPRIn progress
HIPAAStarted
14 Policies

The policies the programme is run against, published at the version your auditor saw.

View all
Access controlAcceptable useSecure developmentIncident responseBusiness continuityData retention
134 Controls

Monitored continuously against the systems they cover. 128 passing, 6 outstanding.

View all
Multi-factor authentication enforcedAccess reviewed quarterlyLeavers de-provisioned in a dayEvery change reviewed by a second engineerInfrastructure defined in codeBackups encrypted and restored on a schedule
9 Subprocessors

Everyone who touches customer data, with the region they hold it in.

View all
AWS · eu-central-1Cloudflare · GlobalMongoDB Atlas · eu-central-1Datadog · eu-west-1Resend · us-east-1Stripe · Global

Every finding lands on a board

Gaps, reviews and remediations become tasks with an owner, a priority and a due date. Scheduled access reviews open their own when they come due.

Learn more
ActiveAll tasksNew view
New taskC
Backlog
3
CYB-7098MP

Quarterly access review: AWS production accounts

Pull every IAM user and role on the prod account and reconcile the entitlements against the joiner-mover-leaver record before the quarter closes.

SecurityDue 15 Apr

Created 12 Apr

CYB-7112KN

Collect the renewed SOC 2 report from Datadog

The report on file expires 30 Apr. Request the new one and the bridge letter ahead of the contract renewal review.

Due 22 Apr

Created 12 Apr

CYB-7126AL

Write up the backup restore test for A.8.13

February's restore drill ran without a written record, so the control has no evidence behind it. Capture the runbook, the result and the sign-off.

Due 30 Apr

Created 13 Apr

To Do
3
CYB-7083MO

Remediate A.5.1, three policies past their review date

Information security policies is failing at 43% readiness because the acceptable use, remote work and encryption policies are all overdue their annual review.

!SecurityDue 11 Apr

Created 8 Apr

CYB-7091RS

Bring the last 12 admin accounts under SSO and MFA

Secure authentication (A.8.5) sits at 91% while these accounts authenticate outside the identity provider policy.

SecurityDue 18 Apr

Created 9 Apr

CYB-7089DC

Chase Acme Payments on the outstanding assessment

The questionnaire went out 14 days ago with no response. Escalate to the vendor owner before the contract review on the 25th.

Due 16 Apr

Created 9 Apr

In Progress
2
CYB-7061MP

Review the evidence package for A.5.15 Access control

Eight files uploaded by the platform team; two failed the reviewed-within-required-period validation and need re-signing.

SecurityDue 12 Apr

Created 5 Apr

CYB-7074MO

Duplicate findings on the vulnerability scan import

March's scan imported twice, so A.8.8 counts 36 open findings where the scanner reported 18. De-duplicate and re-run the readiness calculation.

BugDue 17 Apr

Created 7 Apr

In Review
1
CYB-7052AL

Walkthrough pack for the ISO 27001 auditor engagement

Scope, control list and the evidence index assembled for the external auditor's opening meeting. With Adi for sign-off.

Due 19 Apr

Created 3 Apr

Blocked
0
Paused
0
Done
0

See drift before your auditor does

Dashboards, tasks, and weekly digests keep the work moving between audits. Readiness becomes a number you watch, not a scramble you survive.

Learn more

Framework readiness

Per-framework readiness, least-ready first.

PCI DSS 4.0

58%38/66

SOC 2

71%45/63

NIS2

79%52/66

ISO 27001

86%79/92

Evidence health

Active evidence with expiring and pending-review counts.

148

Active evidence

6

Expiring in 30d

3

Pending review

78%+6%

Weighted readiness across 4 frameworks, last 90 days

6 items expire within 30 days

Upcoming assessments

Scheduled and in-progress vendor assessments by due date.

  • Contoso PaymentsPCI supplier reviewIn progressDue today
  • Fabrikam CloudSaaS security questionnaireIn progressDue in 3d
  • Northwind LogisticsVendor due diligenceScheduledDue Oct 2

An agent that asks before it writes

It reads your vendors and your asset register, and answers how the product works from the documentation. Every create, update and delete stops at a card showing exactly what it is about to change.

Learn more
Vendors mid-assessment
Which vendors are mid-assessment?

Looked up vendors

Three of your twelve, and one is overdue:

Contoso Payments, due today

Acme Cloud, due in 3d

Northwind Logistics, scheduled

Revising a policy
Adding a vendor
How to add a vendor
How do I add a vendor?

Read the documentation

Vendors → Add vendor. Name and type are the only required fields; criticality, owner and contacts can follow later.

Or tell me the name and I will create it for you.

Managed service

Or have the whole program run for you

Bindsec runs vendor due diligence and compliance operations on Cyberwiz: vendor communication, evidence review, and reporting. Same platform, none of the operating load.

Managed service

Built for the people who own the answer

  • Security & GRC

    Proving a framework holds, continuously, and knowing the moment it stops holding.

  • Procurement & vendor management

    Clearing third parties without a spreadsheet chain or a mailbox full of attachments.

  • Auditors & consultants

    Working across client programs from one scoped view, with the evidence already in order.

Provable today, not at audit time.

Run it yourself or have Bindsec run it for you. Either way, the evidence is current and the posture is one place.